The Import Sheets by Spreadsheet task is not available in this early access version but will be included in the public release of 2.0.
Important: If you are loading old tasks with complex sheet pack layouts, you will need to redraw them using our new UI. This redesign was necessary to allow for more customization and features in future releases.
Thanks for letting me test out the latest version.
First of all, I love the UI speed increase – huge improvement! Little improvements like a preview of the naming scheme and simplifying the UI for the task logs go a long way. Grouping dimension strings is also a very nice improvement.
Possible Bugs
Error messages stay visible even when task log has collapsed.
There no longer seems to be a way to quickly search though a list of level, view, or parameter names to quickly narrow down results. I thought I remembered in the previous version I was able to search for some text values to quickly find what I wanted.
The compact UI is problematic when working with long parameter names or values.
Initially, dimensioning overall wall lengths with tie to all grids specified did not tie to any grid. However, after updating to latest version this now works.
In one dimensioning test, a few dimension strings generated at an angle. I did not have grouping enabled for this test. With grouping enabled, the dimensions were as expected.
When dimensioning to center of openings , the leader line to the center was too short. Probably not a bug but some way to control this would be a nice improvement.
I no longer saw any control over how far horizontally or vertically views would be spaced on sheets. I still find that this ability would be helpful as the tightness of the packed sheet views still left me having to manually adjust the spacing.
When packing sheets with automatic new sheets being created for overflow, overflow sheets do not get set parameter values applied that the initial sheet was created with. In the example, the parameters we use to sort and organize our browser did not get applied to the automatically created overflow sheets. I have previously reported this bug.
The ability to drag and reorder naming scheme fields would provide a quality-of-life improvement over having to delete and recrate to reorder.
It would be nice to have the ability to quickly show only the selected elements in a long list of views, etc. Currently have to scroll though list to confirm selections.
Reorder the task log list so the most recent task is at the top of the list.
Hi @AxelSalazar,
Per the above post, we are actively working on Revit 2025 support. In the interim, a solution would be to use an earlier version Revit (if you can). I’m sorry for the inconvenience.
First of all, thank you very much for your feedback. This is exactly the feedback we are looking for during this Canary release stage. We will implement these changes before we go public with the 2.0 release.
The user should be able to rearrange the order in which the sheets get placed on a sheet when using the “Map Views” feature in a Place Views on Sheets Task. As of now, dragging them to rearrange is not a feature.
Using Ctrl+click to multi select views in the Unassigned Views column then using an “add or subtract arrow” found in the Revit Schedule View window to add them to a selected sheet
The UI does not save the Views that have been added to the sheets in the “map views to sheets window” if you hit cancel, causing you to redo work. This would be an inconvenience if mapping multiple views to multiple sheets
Add a search bar that filters out any sheets or views by name
I noticed that the progress bar often gets stuck when running a bundle. In my testing the bar consistently got stuck on the first task and never progressed.
I’m not sure if this is unique to this release, but when I run a tag category Task, Glyph reads all elements behind the wall. When Adjust the Far Clip Offset it changes which elements are tagged, but I would like the elevation views to have a Far Clip Offset of around 50’ to capture any sloped roofs on the building at a later time.
Does Glyph by default read all elements behind certain visible elements in a view?
@Sterling Good question! This isn’t unique to this release but Glyph will try to tag all elements in the view. Since technically the elements are in the view due to your 50’ far clip offset, Glyph will try to tag those as well, even though they are behind other elements.
In the future, we will introduce a feature that will automatically detect elements behind certain visible elements, and skip those, if you want.
